7ce294f38848ebca

AHHH… Don’t ya just love it when good ol’ fashioned science trumps the political establishment! Here’s science at its best. See I told ya we all weren’t crazy. Now it shows we smarter than the average sheepel out there. But we already knew that just took science a little time to catch up.

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

 

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.


Category: Miscellaneous

About the Author


Comments are closed.

Revolver Map


July 2013
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Jan »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031